Sunday, March 30, 2025

National Security Threat


Calling all blackmailers.

With proper credit given to the source of the report, The Guardian on Saturday noted

The wife of the US defense secretary Pete Hegseth attended two meetings with foreign defense officials during which sensitive information was discussed, according to a new report from the Wall Street Journal.

The Journal’s report on Hegseth arrived late on Friday as he faced scrutiny for detailing plans of a military strike in a group chat on Signal, made public by a journalist at the Atlantic who had been added to the chat. Multiple Democrats have called for his resignation while a bipartisan group of senators sent a letter to the defense department calling for an inquiry into the group chat.

Hegseth’s wife, Jennifer Hegseth, has been present at two meetings where sensitive information was discussed, according to the Journal, citing multiple people who were present at the meetings or have knowledge of her presence at them.

The first meeting reportedly was a high-level discussion at the Pentagon with top UK military officials, including the UK secretary of defense, John Healey, that took place in early March, a day after the US announced it would stop sharing military intelligence with Ukraine.

The second reportedly took place in Brussels in mid-February at Nato headquarters during a meeting of the Ukraine Defense Contact Group, a forum of about 50 nations meant to help coordinate military support for Ukraine as it tries to fight off the invasion Russia launched in 2022.

A defense secretary has the discretion to invite anyone to meetings with foreign counterparts, but officials cited by the Journal said that those attending these types of meetings usually have high-level security clearances. While the spouses of defense officials sometimes receive low-level security clearances, it is unclear whether Hegseth’s wife has any clearance.

Advice to Hegseth: stay on your wife's good side. She now has plenty to blackmail you- and the country- with.  If she gets angry with you or decides to brag to a friend about the information she has, it might get to Xi Jinping or Vladimir Putin faster than you can say "Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein- Perfect Together." Also, Mrs. Hegseth's mere presence makes our nation out to be a laughingstock among our allies..... even more than President Trump has already done.

Earlier in the week, we learned of the national security breach in which Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg was inadvertently included in a Signal group text chat of timing and weapons details for an impending American attack upon Houthis in Yemen. Fox News' Laura Ingraham interviewed the National Security Advisor, central to the scandal, and asked (at 1:19 of the 5/26 Comedy Channel video below) how someone unknown could have gotten into the conversation. 

Mike Waltz replied "I mean, I'm sure everybody out there has had a contact where you- it said one person and then a different phone number." Daily Show host Ronny Chieng comments "no one's ever had- no one's ever had that, all right? People don't have a contact with a phone number for, like, a different person- unless they're having an affair."


 


An affair? Well, that's intriguing, especially because now there comes an interesting, prurient, though unreliable report from something called "WIOZ." Wikipedia says World Is One News

is an Indian-English language news channel headquartered in Noida, India. As of March 2025, Media Bias Fact Check rated WION "Mixed" for factual reporting due to a lack of sourcing "in most articles and the promotion of misinformation regarding Covid-19." It has faced scrutiny from multiple foreign countries over its coverage and in 2022 was blocked from YouTube before being reinstated.

So, I don't know. However, WION maintains

On X, Dan Cohen, the founder of Uncaptured News, claimed that Waltz follows what he describes as a "gay pornographic account".

Posting a series of screenshots, Cohen alleged that Waltz "married to @JuliaNesheiwat since 2021 – follows a gay pornography account."

Also read | Who is Jeffrey Goldberg? The journalist accidentally sent classified Yemen war plan

The screenshots show Mike Waltz's official X account @michaelgwaltz among the followers of account 'Big D**k Bottom'.

Cohen in his post stated that while "Waltz and Nusheiwat’s personal lives are their own," it is "well-known that secret sexual improprieties can be used to compromise political figures, and Waltz is in one of the most powerful and sensitive positions in the US government."

"The question must be asked: Does Waltz’s apparent secret lust for black male make him susceptible to blackmail?," he added.

 It very much would, if true. Perhaps it is a hoax.

Apparently, in the meeting there were nineteen individuals, including the J.G., Goldberg. Yet, for some bizarre reason, no one (as far as I can tell) in politics or the media writ large has inquired as to why no one of the 18 (all except Goldberg himself) asked who this unknown "J.G." was.

Perhaps everyone was intimidated, finding it awkward to ask about the identity of the mystery man or woman, believing they were expected to know, and were loathe to reveal their ignorance. Or (less likely) there was a widespread suspicion that Waltz knew who it was, whether it was a professional or personal contact of his.

After the news broke, Fox News' Laura Ingraham can be seen asking Waltz at 1:20 of the 5/26 Comedy Channel video below how someone unknown could have gotten onto the group chat. Waltz replied "I mean, I'm sure everybody out there has had a contact where you- it said one person and then a different phone number." In response, Daily Show host Ronny Chieng commented "no one's ever had- no one's ever had that, all right? People don't have a contact with a phone number for, like, a different person- unless they're having an affair."

An affair? Well, that's interesting. A little funny, and possibly not a joke. No one evinced any curiosity about this unknown individual and Waltz certainly did not know that it was a journalist. Conceivably, though, Waltz feared it may have been someone he personally knew, in which case he would not want to say who it was and would be understandably confident that the individual wouldn't reveal anything publicly. 

If it is for real, we probably won't find out about it. The media is unlikely to touch it unless one of the two political parties brings it up. The Republican Party won't mention it, for obvious reasons. The Democratic Party won't bring it up because it wouldn't want to be seen casting aspersions on something gay and black.

In the unlikely event that Mike Waltz knew who it was, it presented a national security risk. If he (and everyone else) did not know who it was, it presented a national security risk. In either case, the National Security Advisor screwed up. 

So did the Defense Secretary, he who welcomes his wife in on national security secrets, and who should have not presented plans without being certain the venue was completely secure. Also participating was President Trump's untouchable Chief of Staff, Susie Wiles, who has overall responsibility for staff operations. Somewhere, Xi Jinping, Vladimir Putin, and who knows who else are having a good laugh at our expense.



No comments:

The Smartest and Most Spineless in the Room

In November of 2013, conservative Mark Steyn of the conservative National Review wrote contemptuously Still, as historian Michael Beschlos...