Imagine if the people with all the opinions were actually required to read this before opening their mouths. pic.twitter.com/QBhpzKOZ7r
— jelani cobb (@jelani9) June 18, 2021
Imagine, too, if people with all the opinions about racism
were actually required at an academic forum to have a clue of what racism is:
In which academic discipline is this circular, naive, deer-caught-in-the-headlights response to a basic and urgent question considered insightful or excellent?
— John McWhorter (@JohnHMcWhorter) June 1, 2021
A national culture exempting this (which, sadly, is typical of him) from judgment is unintentionally racist itself. pic.twitter.com/n493NpjFmx
Ibram X. Kendi is not a top Critical Race Theory theorist,
yet is the inventor of anti-racism, which is linked to CRT. And in the video to
which McWhorter links, Kendi states "racism, I would define it, as a
collection of racist policies that lead to racial inequity that are
substantiated by racist ideas."
After members of the audience understandably laugh nervously, Kendi continues
Sure- a collection of racist policies that lead to racial inequity that are substantiated by racist ideas. And anti-racism is pretty simple using the same terms. Anti-racism is a collection of anti-racist policies leading to racial- anyone want to take a guess?- equity that are substantiated by anti-racist ideas.
Such splendid double-talk from the author of "How to be an Antiracist" should not go unnoticed. In a mere 22 words- four of them "I would define it"- Kendi uses racism, racial, or racist four times. He might as well have been a second grade English/language arts teacher giving his students an example of how not to define a word.
No comments:
Post a Comment