On Sunday's "State of the Union," Dr. Anthony Fauci told CNN host
Jake Tapper
A political scientist weighs in with an insightful response:
Share |
It's -- it's very difficult to go back and say that. I mean,
obviously, you could logically say, that if you had a process that was ongoing,
and you started mitigation earlier, you could have saved lives. Obviously, no
one is going to deny that.
But what goes into those kinds of decisions is -- is complicated.
But you're right. I mean, obviously, if we had, right from the very beginning,
shut everything down, it may have been a little bit different.
But there was a lot of pushback about shutting things down
back then.
A political scientist weighs in with an insightful response:
Very grateful for Dr. Fauci's effort to ensure Americans understand that Trump's failure to deal w the pandemic properly in Jan & Feb to protect the stock market was intentional, not out of ignorance to the threat & that it cost Americans their lives. https://t.co/TkoDtzGS7h— Rachel "The Doc" Bitecofer 📈🔭🍌 (@RachelBitecofer) April 13, 2020
The New York Times reported Saturday that intelligence
sources in early January informed the National Security Council that the virus
would spread to the USA. On January 28 the President received from trade advisor Peter Navarro a memorandum noting, the Times reported, "the potential risks of a coronavirus pandemic." Health and Human Services secretary Azar
warned Trump on January 30 about the possibility of a pandemic. (Axios calculates a minimum of ten times that either the President or his Administration was warned.) Moreover
By the third week in February, the administration’s top
public health experts concluded they should recommend to Mr. Trump a new
approach that would include warning the American people of the risks and urging
steps like social distancing and staying home from work. But the White House
focused instead on messaging and crucial additional weeks went by before their
views were reluctantly accepted by the president — time when the virus spread
largely unimpeded.
In his behalf, President Trump does brag about having ordered on
January 29 the cessation of flights from mainland China by American airlines.
However, Chinese airlines continued their flights to the USA and in the following two months, approximately 40,000 people- roughly 60% not American
citizens- have nonetheless arrived. Give that man a cookie.
Vox explains that several governors have stated that orders for personal
protective equipment have been canceled "because the
federal government outbid them. This has led to some finding creative ways to
disguise their orders to mask them from the Trump administration." There is one obvious reason the Trump
Administration has taken this approach.
Two months in, tens of thousands of Americans dead, hundreds
of thousands more infected and, as The Washington Post observed, "the Trump
administration still has no clear plan for ending the coronavirus crisis."
It's not for lack of knowledge or creativity, though. We learn
Trump shows up to task force meetings infrequently, but when
he does, he is a lively presence who often makes the gatherings more
lighthearted, aides said. In one meeting, Trump suggested that he present the
good news and Anthony S. Fauci, the director of the National Institute of
Allergy and Infectious Diseases, give the bad news — a good-cop-bad-cop
addition to the evening briefing.
No time for a plan, but time for a good show. If the federal
government had "started mitigation earlier, you could have saved
lives," Dr. Fauci concedes. However, neither he nor we accounted for
having a President who would consider that a bug and not a benefit.
Share |
No comments:
Post a Comment