In a debate in January at Drake University in Des Moines,
Iowa,
He should have owned it because many, if not most, voters would have agreed with him.
Share |
Sens. Bernie Sanders
and Elizabeth Warren finally addressed some of the escalating conflict between
the two when they tackled a question about sexism and the 2020 election.
Sanders emphasized that he had championed Warren for the
presidency in the past and said it was “incomprehensible” that he would argue a
woman couldn’t win. Warren, meanwhile, seized on this exchange to make her case
about why women’s electability in 2020 shouldn’t be questioned — the subject at
the heart of a supposed disagreement she had with Sanders.
The following weekend, body language expert Janine Driver
told Joy Ann Reid
He looks away, he laughs. I think he may have been coached
to laugh in this moment. A lot of politicians are coached to laugh in the
difficult times so we focus on the laughter and it's supposed to send a message
that this isn't serious. But it is serious.
If he said, which I believe that he did, he would have been
better to just own it. You know, Barack Obama wrote a book years ago. He said
what in the book? He tried cocaine and marijuana and he never touched the stuff
again. We never talked about it when he was President after that. If Bernie
just owned it, it would have just disappeared and we wouldn't be talking about
it six days later.
He should have owned it because many, if not most, voters would have agreed with him.
Many people agree an overemphasis on gender as the cause of Hillary Clinton's defeat backfired, making Democrats overly cautious about nominating a female candidate in 2020.— Jonathan Chait (@jonathanchait) March 7, 2020
This isn't the only reason that Elizabeth Warren's campaign
went up in flames. Sadly, many people
believed what the Vermont senator was accused of telling the Massachusetts senator was
accurate- that a woman could not be elected President at this time. And by calling Sanders on his remark, Warren may have reinforced the notion that a woman was a risky choice- in an election cycle in which Democrats are focused (perhaps obsessed) with nominating a candidate they believe can beat the incumbent.
Ironies abound in this campaign season. In this case at least, Elizabeth Warren's
boldness and candor may have helped sow the seeds of the destruction of her own
campaign.
Share |
No comments:
Post a Comment