If the importance of the Biden-Sanders feud on Social
Security highlighted by Sunday night's debate in Washington, D.C. would rate as
an "8" on a scale of 0 to 10, this would be no more than a
"2." Still, it's worth considering this exchange:
That was not "the whole region should have an interest" in its people and regional stability. It was "the whole region has an interest...."
Share |
Ilia Calderón: (01:27)
To be clear, Senator Sanders, Cuba has been a dictatorship
for decades. Shouldn’t we judge dictators by the violation of human rights and
not by any of their alleged achievements?
Bernie Sanders: (01:39)
Well, I think you can make the same point about China. China
is undoubtedly an authoritarian society. Okay? But would anybody deny, any
economists deny that extreme poverty in China today is much less than what it
was 40 or 50 years ago? That’s a fact. So I think we condemn authoritarianism,
whether it’s in China, Russia, Cuba, any place else. But to simply say that nothing
ever done by any of those administrations had a positive impact on their
people, would I think be incorrect.
Ilia Calderón: (02:14)
Vice president Biden, you have criticized Senator Sanders
for bracing Castro’s education system, but in 2016 president Obama said Cuba
made “A great progress in educating young people and that its healthcare system
is a huge achievement that they should be congratulated for” How is that
different from what Senator Sanders has said?
Joe Biden: (02:36)
He was trying to change Cuban policies so the Cuban people
would get out from under the thumb of the Castro and his brother. That is to
change the policy so that we can impact on Cuba’s policy by getting them opened
up. That was about, but the praising of the Sandinistas, the praising of Cuba,
the praising just now of China. China is an authoritarian dictatorship. That’s
what it is. We have to deal with them because they’re there.
The United States recognizes the progress that Cuba has made
as a nation, its enormous achievements in education and in health care. And
perhaps most importantly, I affirm that Cuba’s destiny will not be decided by
the United States or any other nation. Cuba is sovereign and rightly has great pride
and the future of Cuba will be decided by Cubans, not by anybody else.
At the same time, as we do wherever we go around the world,
I made it clear that the United States will continue to speak up on behalf of
democracy, including the right of the Cuban people to decide their own future.
We’ll speak out on behalf of universal human rights, including freedom of
speech and assembly and religion. Indeed, I look forward to meeting with and
hearing from Cuban civil society leaders tomorrow.
These two paragraphs suggest that President Obama focused on
the importance of a more liberal society in Cuba or, as Biden would put it,
"opening up." However, the
President continued (and note the "but")
But as you heard, President Castro also addressed what he
views as shortcomings in the United States around basic needs for people and
poverty and inequality and race relations, and we welcome that constructive
dialogue as well because we believe that when we share our deepest beliefs and
ideas with an attitude of mutual respect that we can both learn and make the
lives of our people better.
A part of normalizing relationships means that we discuss
these differences directly, so I’m very pleased that we’ve agreed to hold our
next U.S.-Cuba human rights dialogue here in Havana this year. And both of our
countries will welcome our visits by independent United Nations experts as we
combat human trafficking, which we agree is a profound violation of human rights.
Well, o.k., the American system was not perfect, even before President Trump. However, the tone- and words- of equivalence are startling. Clearly, Obama is suggesting that
"mak(ing) the lives of our people better" is as much an imperative in
the USA as it is in Cuba.
That is not accurate, and is in stark contrast to
"trying to change Cuban policies so the Cuban people would get out from
under the thumb of the Castro and his brother." Nonetheless, it gets worse
with an acceptance of agree to disagree:
Even as we discuss these differences, we share a belief we
can continue to make progress in those areas that we have in common. President
Castro, you said in Panama that we might disagree on something today on which
we would agree tomorrow. And that has certainly been the case over the past 15
months and the days leading up to this visit.
And today, I can report that we continue to move forward on
many fronts when it comes to normalizing relations. We’re moving ahead with
more opportunities for Americans to travel to Cuba and interact with the Cuban
people.
Toward the end of his statement, President Obama pressed on
with his emphasis on detente, friendliness, and the quaint notion that Havana
and Washington aren't much different from each other. He stated
And although we didn’t have an extensive discussion of
Venezuela, we did touch on the subject. And I believe the whole region has an
interest in a country that is addressing their economic challenges, is
responsive to the aspirations of its people and is a source of stability in the
region.
That is, I believe, an interest we should all share. So,
again, President Castro, I want to thank you for welcoming me. I think it’s
fair to say the United States and Cuba are now engaged in many areas and with
each passing day more Americans are coming to Cuba, more U.S. business and
school and faith groups are working to forge new partnerships with the Cuban
people.
That was not "the whole region should have an interest" in its people and regional stability. It was "the whole region has an interest...."
Maybe the President was setting the right tone. The Cold War
was over- but you'd never know it from Biden's demonization of Senator Sanders
for finding something a little praiseworthy in the Cuban regime. "Cuba is sovereign and rightly has great pride" did not come from democratic socialist Bernie Sanders but from the 44th President.
Early in his speech, Barack Obama had stated "the
sight of a U.S. president here in Havana would have been unimaginable, but this
is a new day." Joe Biden's
"new day" is this: Barack Obama was always right and when Bernie
Sanders agrees with him, Sanders is wrong. If that seems to make no sense, feel
free to take it up with Democratic voters and politicos who believe the former vice-president should be their standard-bearer.
Share |
No comments:
Post a Comment