In his opening statement Monday, House Judiciary Committee
ranking member Doug Collins (not this Doug Collins) of Georgia repeated a theme often struck by
Republicans on his committee, on the Intelligence Committee, and elsewhere. He
remarked
These aren't mere conservative activists or well-connected Republican lawyers.They were Republican Representatives and Senators who in a few cases already had decided to encourage impeachment and, in a larger number of instances, congressional members who were gearing up for investigations of President Hillary Clinton.
Share |
In 2016, the American people had the audacity to elect, in
Democrats’ eyes, the wrong person as president. That is the entire reason we
are here. Democrats, and their allies in the media and the permanent federal
bureaucracy, are furious at the American people. They cannot abide as president
a man who promised American voters he would shake up Washington. The man who
said he would work for them — the Forgotten Man and Woman — not the entrenched
political elites.
Just 19 minutes after noon on Inauguration Day, 2017, the
Washington Post ran the headline: “The Campaign to Impeach President Trump Has
Begun.” Mark Zaid, who would later become the attorney for the infamous
whistleblower, tweeted in January 2017 that a “coup has started,” and that
“impeachment will follow ultimately.” In May of this year, Representative Al
Green said, “If we don’t impeach the president, he will get reelected.” It
appears that Representative Green won the argument within the Democratic
caucus.
As Steve M notes, this refers to a group which had urged
impeachment of President Trump over enoluments, and whose website
ImpeachDonaldTrumpNow.org, has been
dormant since July 15, 2019.
There is no indication that this organization had any
influence whatsoever on Speaker Pelosi's decision to forge ahead with an
impeachment inquiry, nor upon any Democrat who has supported the inquiry or
impeachment itself.
No Democratic officeholder has been linked to the group.
However, there are members of Congress who supported impeachment of a President
even before inauguration. On November 4,
2016 Vanity Fair reported that Republican pols were anticipating a victory by
Hillary Clinton and
“There's been nothing like this where you can have potential
criminal charges,” New York Rep. Peter King said in a radio interview Tuesday.
“You really could have a constitutional crisis here,” he added, echoing a
similar charge by Texas Rep. Louie Gohmert and Wisconsin Rep. Jim
Sensenbrenner.
Other Republicans are already using the “I” word. “Assuming
she wins, and the investigation goes forward, and it looks like an indictment
is pending, at that point in time, under the Constitution, the House of
Representatives would engage in an impeachment trial," Texas Rep. Michael
McCaul said on Fox News. “They would go to the Senate and impeachment
proceedings and removal would take place.” Wisconsin senator Ron Johnson
declared that Clinton could be impeached for “high crime or misdemeanor.” And
Donald Trump, who has turned “lock her up” into a rallying cry at his campaign
stops, said Wednesday that Clinton would be impeached just as surely as Bill
Clinton was. “You know it’s going to happen. And in all fairness, we went
through it with her husband. He was impeached,” the Republican nominee said at
a rally in Florida Wednesday, adding that Hillary is “most corrupt person ever
to seek the presidency.”
These aren't mere conservative activists or well-connected Republican lawyers.They were Republican Representatives and Senators who in a few cases already had decided to encourage impeachment and, in a larger number of instances, congressional members who were gearing up for investigations of President Hillary Clinton.
Democrats deliberated carefully, acted deliberately, and
chose to ignore enoluments and other abuses of power in favor of a focus on one
narrow, albeit extremely significant, issue. The only question, had Hillary
Clinton been elected, is whether the GOP would have waited till she was
inaugurated on January 20, 2017.
Share |
No comments:
Post a Comment