Member of Freedom Caucus and of House Judiciary Committee
and sex-crimes apologist:
In the Democratic presidential race, on the broad topic of deregulation (or its sister, privatization), there has been- as far as I know- no position paper by any of the candidates. and no forum, no town hall, and no debate questions. (If there had been, we would have heard about food safety inspections.) Its absence says a lot, whether about the media, the candidates themselves, or the false narrative that the Democratic Party is tempted by socialism and hurtling leftward.
Share |
.@SpeakerPelosi is counting impeachment votes. Here’s what President Trump is counting:— Rep. Jim Jordan (@Jim_Jordan) December 6, 2019
-266k new jobs
-54k in manufacturing
-Unemployment at 50 yr low
-Wages up 3%
Less taxes and regulation, more freedom for you and your family. Get gov’t out of the way, and the economy booms.
Less taxes and regulation, more freedom for you and your
family. Also, more food poisoning. The Hill in September reported
A new rule, finalized today, would reduce the number of
government food safety inspectors in pork plants by 40 percent and remove most
of the remaining inspectors from production lines. In their place, a smaller
number of company employees — who are not required to receive any training —
would conduct the “sorting” tasks that the U.S. Department of Agriculture
(USDA) previously referred to as “inspection.” The rule would also allow
companies to design their own microbiological testing programs to measure food
safety rather than requiring companies to meet the same standard.
Equally alarming, the new rule would remove all line speed
limits in the plants, allowing companies to speed up their lines with abandon.
With fewer government inspectors on the slaughter lines, there would be fewer
trained workers watching out for consumer safety. Faster line speeds would make
it harder for the limited number of remaining meat inspectors and plant workers
to do their jobs.
The experience from a long-running pilot project that
involved five large hog slaughterhouses offers some insight into the possible
impact of such radical deregulation. Consumer groups reviewed the government’s
data from the five pilot plants and other plants of comparable size. They found
that the plants with fewer inspectors and faster lines had more regulatory
violations than others....
It’s not only consumers of meat who would pay a price for
this misguided and dangerous new rule. There are more than 90,000 pork
slaughterhouse workers whose health and limbs are already at risk under the
current line speed limit of 1,106 hogs per hour. Pork slaughterhouse workers
will tell you that they can barely keep up with current line speeds. They work
in noisy, slippery workplaces with large knives, hooks and bandsaws, making
tens of thousands of forceful repetitive motions on each and every shift to cut
and break down the hogs.
The USDA is ignoring three decades of studies indicating
that faster line speeds and the forceful nature of the work in meatpacking
plants are the root causes of a staggeringly high rate of work-related injuries
and illnesses.
In the Democratic presidential race, on the broad topic of deregulation (or its sister, privatization), there has been- as far as I know- no position paper by any of the candidates. and no forum, no town hall, and no debate questions. (If there had been, we would have heard about food safety inspections.) Its absence says a lot, whether about the media, the candidates themselves, or the false narrative that the Democratic Party is tempted by socialism and hurtling leftward.
Share |
No comments:
Post a Comment