This is not- repeat- this is not Nicolle Wallace's mistake.
The MSNBC host (in remarks beginning at 8:02 of the video below) stated
This is why it is critical to label the document which President Trump released as it was titled, a "Memorandum," or more generically, a summary.
Share |
Jeanne... I've referenced twice this reporting last Friday
by reporter Rebeca Ballhaus, who wrote that in eight times in that conversation
you reported Pompeo listened in on, Donald Trump mentioned to the Ukrainian
president, his his desire, his wish, or his hope,his aspiration that the Bidens
be investigated.
Wall Street Journal reporter Jeanne Cummings- not one of the
three writers of the September 21, 2019 story- responded
Absolutely. We were told he kept- we were told that he just
kept coming back to it and whne the President of Ukraine would try to move to a
different issue, for instance, buying more military equipment, the President
would find his way back to "yeah, I hear you, but" and he would again
make a pitch that there is something wrong with what the Bidens have done and
the corruption around them needed to be investigated. And so when the
transcript itself came out, the whole world could see there it was he came back
to it, over and over again.
This is why it is critical to label the document which President Trump released as it was titled, a "Memorandum," or more generically, a summary.
In this paragraph of the "memorandum" the
President of the USA suggests twice that Ukraine investigate the Bidens:
I would like you to do us a favor though because our country
has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a lot about it. I would like you to
find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say
Crowdstrike... I guess you have one of your wealthy people... The server, they
say Ukraine has it. There are a lot of things that went on, the whole
situation. I think you’re surrounding yourself with some of the same people. I
would like to have the Attorney General call you or your people and I would
like you to get to the bottom of it.
(1- "I would like to find out what happened" and
2-"I would like you get to the bottom of it.")
The next time Trump speaks- according to what has been
commonly branded a "transcript"- he asks three (3) times for help from Ukraine:
Good because I heard you had a prosecutor who was very good
and he was shut down and that’s really unfair. A lot of people are talking
about that, the way they shut your very good prosecutor down and you had some very
bad people involved. Mr. Giuliani is a highly respected man. He was the mayor
of New York City, a great mayor, and I would like him to call you. I will ask him to call you along with the Attorney
General. Rudy very much knows what’s happening and he is a very capable guy. If
you could speak to him that would be great.4 The former ambassador from the
United States, the woman, was bad news and the people she was dealing with in
the Ukraine were bad news so I just want to let you know that. The other thing,
There’s a lot of talk about Biden’s son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and
a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the
Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the
prosecution so if you can look into it... It sounds horrible to me.
(3- "I would him to call you. I will ask him to call
you along with the Attorney General. Rudy very much knows what's happening and
his a very capable guy. If you could speak to him that would be great."; 4- "..... a lot of people want to
find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be
great"; 5- "Biden went around
bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it.")
And there it is- five times.
But it is neither Wallace nor Cummings who is speaking out of turn.
Ballhaus and two other Wall Street Journal reporters on 9/21 had written
President Trump in a July phone call repeatedly pressured
the president of Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden’s son, according to people
familiar with the matter, urging Volodymyr Zelensky about eight times to work
with Rudy Giuliani on a probe that could hamper Mr. Trump’s potential 2020
opponent.
So where are the missing three times (i.e., 8 minus 5)? There are three possibilities:
1) The WSJ got it flat-out wrong.
2) The "about eight times" really was five
times. However, this error would not have pertained to a
small-town routine school board meeting but a conversation in which the alleged
leader of the world's greatest superpower tried to persuade a foreign country
to investigate a political rival.
2) The "memorandum" was not a transcript but a summary, with the transcriber having believed it unnecessary
to insert portions which, coincidentally or not, included at least three
other times Trump pressured Zelensky.
4) There was at least one other communication, presumably a
phone call, between Zelensky and Trump, in which Trump pulled his Cosa Nostra
act on the Ukrainian president.
The Wall Street Journal is considered one of the greater
newspapers in the nation. It would constitute journalistic malpractice if
either (1) or (2) above accounts for the discrepancy. The
transcript may not have been a transcript but a summary, and not a very good
one. Alternatively, the White House has locked away records of another
conversation between Trump and Zelensky. This might account for President
Trump's surprise decision to release this fairly damning
transcript/memorandum/summary, as well as Speaker McConnell's advice to the
President that he do so.
The difference between "about eight times" and
"eight times" may be due to something innocent. However, this
may be one of Donald Trump's greatest diversions of all, releasing something
very bad when there is one or more things much worse, figuring that would
satisfy the press and his critics. Someone should find out which it is.
Share |
No comments:
Post a Comment