From the Department of Wishful Thinking:
It's possible, of course. However, in July, 2015 presidential candidate Lindsey Graham labeled Donald Trump a "jackass" who "shouldn't be commander-in-chief." Trump also was "unfit for office" and "a race-baiting, xenophobic bigot." Now Graham says
The following February, presidential candidate Marco Rubio called Trump "a con artist" who "has spent his entire career sticking it to the little guy,"and warned the USA cannot give "the nuclear codes of the United States to an erratic individual."
Share
|
So that's 1 Republican vote for removal. https://t.co/ZhTDCFXoiS— David Frum (@davidfrum) October 5, 2019
It's possible, of course. However, in July, 2015 presidential candidate Lindsey Graham labeled Donald Trump a "jackass" who "shouldn't be commander-in-chief." Trump also was "unfit for office" and "a race-baiting, xenophobic bigot." Now Graham says
You can't get a parking ticket conviction based on hearsay.
The whistleblower didn't hear the phone call. Who told the whistleblower about
the phone call and everything else? Donald Trump is still an American. Every
American deserves to confront their accuser. So this is a sham as far as I'm
concerned.
The following February, presidential candidate Marco Rubio called Trump "a con artist" who "has spent his entire career sticking it to the little guy,"and warned the USA cannot give "the nuclear codes of the United States to an erratic individual."
After (justifiably) criticizing mainland China the past few
weeks, Rubio was asked his response to the President publicly challenging China
to investigate Joe and Hunter Biden. The Florida senator replied
I don’t think that’s a real request. I think he did it to
gig you guys [reporters]. I think he did it to provoke you to ask me and others
and get outraged by it. He plays it like a violin and everybody falls right in,
that’s not a real request.
At least Trump Graham largely held out until he played golf
with Trump, at which time the latter may have explained to the former the facts
of life, which may have pertained to the power of the presidency or anything
else. However, it's disconcerting to see
the President rip from the guy Trump once referred to as "little
Marco" the little manhood Rubio still had left.
Donald Trump is typically very persuasive, where persuasive
is spelled "intimidating."
Moreover, Republicans are, as a species, generally particularly
attracted to power, strength, and a need to be with a winner, and Donald Trump
is president of the United States of America.
So we cannot be confident that Senator Mitt Romney would
vote to uphold the impeachment of President Trump. The Utah senator thus far
has shown more courage than arguably any Senate Republican. However, though he undoubtedly is one of the two or three Republicans
most likely to vote to convict the President, Romney is not a sure thing and
would be unlikely to stand alone as a "yea."
Additionally, the Senate would set its own rules if the
House votes to impeach.And whatever his assurances now, Mitch McConnell
ultimately would decide whether there is a trial, when it would take place and
under what conditions, and when the vote would take place. No one can know how
that would play out, as Associate Justice of the Supreme Court Merrick Garland
would tell us.
No comments:
Post a Comment