On Thursday's "Dateline White House," Nicole Wallace, White
House communications Director for George W. Bush, led a discussion about an
upcoming book by James Mattis. Mattis tendered to President Trump his
resignation as Secretary of Defense late last year and part of the
excerpt-which bears upon the role(s) of Wallace's former boss and his
successor- shown by Wallace read
Bush is a former President and thus bears some responsibility. But it has been nine years since he left office, and President Trump's every move is not predicated on "what did President Bush do and how can I undo it?"
Share |
Nations with allies thrive, and those without them wither.
Alone, America cannot protect our people and our economy. At this time, we can
see storm clouds gathering. A polemicist's role is not sufficient for a leader.
Well-meaning, Wallace remarked
It is abundantly clear, if you take that statement from
Mattis at the beginning with Mattis' letter- he resigned in a policy dispute
with Donald Trump over the precipitous withdrawal of troops from Syria.... With
that excerpt from the book, you have to me perhaps the most subtle but the most
stinging rebuke of Donald Trump.
Yes and no, respectively. The American people, aside from a
portion of individuals which voted against Donald Trump in 2016, do not do
subtle. After Eugene Robinson (who mailed it in years ago) responded
"exactly" and went on to say whatever he said, it was left to MattMiller to explain
I hate to be a contrarian. I have a great deal of respect
for General Mattis; he's a great patriot. That essay left me thoroughly
unimpressed, probably for the word you used- it was too subtle.
There are a lot of reasons that Donald Trump is President
today. But one of the reasons is there are too many people that decided
"it's not my fight to take him on: and I think Jim Mattis has decided it's
not his fight to take him on.
Everyone in this country who knows how unfit Donald Trump is
for this office has the responsibility to say something about it and do
something about it but that responsibility is higher for those who served in
that Administration and really know- really saw first-hand just how unfit he is
for that office And I don't think this is the time for Jim Mattis to be subtle.
I think this is time for him to tell the American public this man is not fit to
be President and I know he probably thinks it inappropriate for him as a former
military leader, and I know he's been marshaling his credibility, and his
reputation, his integrity his entire life and this is the time to use it.
Miller was talking about James Mattis- but he might as well
have been referring to someone else additionally. Wallace responded
Someone asks me once a week the same question about George W
Bush- where's George Bush and why doesn't he same something? And I'm sure they
ask Valerie Jarrett about Obama, too. And I mean, I take your point about
people who have seen him up close- but you could say the same thing about HR
McMaster, Dina Powell, Rex Tillerson ....
Bush is a former President and thus bears some responsibility. But it has been nine years since he left office, and President Trump's every move is not predicated on "what did President Bush do and how can I undo it?"
The Trump Administration has rolled back regulations on
methane-emission rules. Predictably and justifiably, environmentalists and
climate activists have denounced the move.
However, reaction from the fossil fuel industry has not been universally positive because
it is a boon to oil and gas interests at the expense of natural gas. It is
the latest in a series of aggressive moves by the
administration to roll back regulations imposed by the administration of former
President Obama.
The EPA in June finalized plans for replacing Obama-era
regulations on emissions from coal-fired power plants. Administrator Andrew
Wheeler also signed the Affordable Clean Energy Rule, which gives individual
states wide discretion to decide whether to require limited efficiency upgrades
at individual coal-fired power plants.
Why, of course: Obama did it, and so it must be undone. It's not enough for Barack Obama that
candidate Trump and his surrogates routinely denounced the 44th President
during the presidential campaign and that Trump's Administration, in its
ideological extremism and commitment to corruption stands in stark contrast to
"no-drama Obama."
President Trump seeks to implement policies through
regulation and deregulation, Executive Orders and legislation as a means to
rebuke Barack Obama. He is authorized to do, constrained only by constitution
and law, and will do so, unconstrained.
In an interview for the October issue of The Atlantic, James
Mattis stated "There is a period in which I owe my silence. It’s not
eternal. It’s not going to be forever." As Matt Miller told the MSNBC
audience, "this is the time" for Mattis. But it's time also for someone else who has been marshaling his credibility, reputation, and integrity, and it's a former President who is not short, a Texan, and bearing the name "Bush."
Share |
No comments:
Post a Comment