In his opening statement yesterday as chairperson of the
House Intelligence Committee, Representative Adam Schiff (D-Ca.) noted the
greed, corruption, and dishonesty which the Special Counsel uncovered in the
Trump Administration. However, he emphasized a different problem when he told
Robert Mueller
Charlie Pierce noted "Schiff's argument about disloyalty is what established the mood." Pierce maintained
Share |
Your investigation determined that the Trump campaign,
including Donald Trump himself, knew that a foreign power was intervening in
our election and welcomed it, built Russian meddling into their strategy and
used it.
Disloyalty to country. Those are strong words, but how else
are we to describe a presidential campaign which did not inform the authorities
of a foreign offer of dirt on their opponent, which did not publicly shun it or
turn it away, but which instead invited it, encouraged it and made full use of
it?
That disloyalty may not have been criminal. Constrained by
uncooperative witnesses, the destruction of documents and the use of encrypted
communications, your team was not able to establish each of the elements of the
crime of conspiracy beyond a reasonable doubt, so not a provable crime in any
event.
But I think maybe something worse: The crime is the
violation of law written by Congress. But disloyalty to country violates the
very oath of citizenship, our devotion to a core principle on which our nation
was founded that we, the people and not some foreign power that wishes us ill,
we decide who governs us.
Charlie Pierce noted "Schiff's argument about disloyalty is what established the mood." Pierce maintained
Instead of Gohmert's bellowing that Mueller's investigation
was "un-American," we had the Democratic members of the committee
explaining the actual un-Americanism of allowing foreign ratfckers to help pick
a president. And, if there was a moment that drove this all the way home, it
came when Mueller told the committee that foreign ratfcking was not merely
something out of recent history.
And why not? It worked the first time and six weeks ago
During an interview with ABC News' George Stephanopoulos,
Trump was asked whether his campaign would accept information from foreign
governments in this upcoming election or turn it over to the FBI.
"I think maybe you do both," Trump said, adding
that if Norway had information on an opponent, he thinks he would want to hear
it. "I think you might want to listen, there's nothing wrong with
listening."
When asked whether he would want that type of interference
in the 2020 election, Trump said: "It's not an interference."
"They have information. I think I'd take it,"
Trump continued. "If I thought there was something wrong, I'd go maybe to
the FBI."
That's "maybe" as in "if it will benefit me
financially."
President Trump will try to paint this election as his
kind of people against the Democratic kind, "us" vs.
"them," patriots vs. traitors, the latter as he has tried to portray
Representatives Ocasio-Cortez, Pressley, Tlaib, and Omar.
Democrats can embrace being the party of openness,
diversity, and inclusiveness, as those four congresswomen represent. But they already are largely perceived as that.
And give voters the choice being a party which has embraced those values and
one which has embraced the flag.... we don't want to know the outcome.
Fortunately (though unfortunately because he actually is the President), Donald Trump has given Democrats an opening, one wide enough
march an army through, one implied by chairperson Schiff. Donald Trump is
disloyal- and barely tries to hide it.
He is disloyal, unpatriotic, and flat-out does not like this
country.
Embrace that, Democrats.
Put the President on the defensive about loyalty to the country. It's
not enough to point out that Trump committed obstruction of justice, which is
an abstraction to most people. Few voters are going to rush out to vote against someone because they've been convinced he has
committed a crime they may suspect (inaccurately) other politicians have committed.
This is not John McCain, George Herbert Walker Bush, or even George W. Bush the Democratic Party is running against. It is Donald J. Trump,
who a while back sold out this nation to the highest bidder. A Garry Trudeau character knows what to call him. Try it.
Share |
No comments:
Post a Comment