The New York Times asked twenty-two Democratic candidates the
same eighteen questions, including such pertinent ones as "how many hours
of sleep do you get a night"; "describe the last time you were
embarrassed: why?:";what is your comfort food on the campaign
trail?": and "what do you do to relax?" (They forgot "if
you were an animal, what animal would you be?")
There are other promises broken by President Trump. But arguably the most important in terms of policy, and virtually inarguably the most powerful strategically, is in the matter of earned benefits and Medicaid. In March Vox explained
Share |
As long as they went to all this effort, the Times should
have included "what were the failings of President Obama- if there were
any?" It's even money a popular
answer would have been "none- why would you even think such a thing?"
Matt Stoller has labeled Barack Obama "a bad President" and hence could never get out of the gate in a Democratic
primary campaign. However, he has good advice for the general election campaign:
Trump is a weak candidate and I don't think he'll win reelection. But the strongest attack line is one the Democrats won't use, which is that Trump is a weak and corrupt politician who breaks his promises, just like Bush, Obama and Hillary.— Matt Stoller (@matthewstoller) July 29, 2019
If we give them enough time, Democrats probably will point
out that Donald Trump has been a corrupt President. But they will assiduously
avoid identifying Trump as weak, and probably will little note that he
continuously breaks his promises (video below from 3/17).
Oh, they- or at least a surrogate or two- will ridicule the
President because Mexico has not paid for a border wall. Nonetheless, that will
be drowned out by condemnation of Trump because of his immigration policies,
including his effort to get a wall built. Democrats thereby will miss an
opportunity to remind voters on the (figurative) fence that Trump has let them
down because he can't get anything done.
They will castigate the President because he is a racist, as
evidenced by his vicious attack upon Representative Cummings and the people of
Baltimore. What they will not do, though, is to inform voters that before he
became President, Donald Trump vowed that he would transform the city into a
veritable heaven on earth. Nor will
Democrats emphasize that the President is failing the people of southern Ohio,
southeastern Pennsylvania, and of other places by the opiate epidemic which
rages on under his watch. (Most of such
areas are represented by Republicans, and we cannot offend the other side. It's
just not done.)
There are other promises broken by President Trump. But arguably the most important in terms of policy, and virtually inarguably the most powerful strategically, is in the matter of earned benefits and Medicaid. In March Vox explained
President Donald Trump’s 2020 budget breaks one of his
biggest campaign promises to voters: that he would leave Medicaid, Social
Security, and Medicare untouched.
“I’m not going to cut Social Security like every other
Republican and I’m not going to cut Medicare or Medicaid,” Trump told the Daily
Signal, a conservative publication affiliated with the Heritage Foundation, in
2015.
Over the next 10 years, Trump’s 2020 budget proposal aims to
spend $1.5 trillion less on Medicaid — instead allocating $1.2 trillion in a
block-grant program to states — $25 billion less on Social Security, and $845
billion less on Medicare (some of that is reclassified to a different department).
Their intentions are to cut benefits under Medicaid and Social Security. The
impact on Medicare is more complicated...
Addressing the President's policies on Social Security and
Medicare highlights Trump's habit of breaking promises, reinforces the position
of the Democratic Party as the protector of the old and the infirm, and exposes
Donald Russia as just another politician who says one thing while campaigning
and then does another.
The Democratic Party can add that Trump does so with a
heaping topping of bigotry. However, it should emphasize that the President's
pattern of duplicity is a continuation of a pattern of presidential behavior
that includes our 44th President, a
concession to reality that- as Stoller understands- is sadly unlikely.
Share |
No comments:
Post a Comment