The headline on a Fox News story reads "Mark Meadows
stays neutral in Trump, Cummings feud: 'neither man is a racist'" and
writer Danielle Wallace writes "Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., refused to take
sides in the ongoing feud between President Trump and Rep. Elijah Cummings,
D-M.D., Monday, concluding that 'neither man is a racist.'”
Though Meadows is a birther, committee chairperson Cummings responded to the criticism by Pressley and Tlaib by riding to his friend's rescue, stating
Share |
So the question to Fox News is "who is the bigger racist- Mark Meadows or Elijah Cummings?"
It should be obvious to anyone not sucked in to the Stepford-like Trump orbit that this formulation is neither fair nor objective, given that only one
human being (assuming that is an accurate description) ever has accused Elijah
Cummings of being racist, and that with no evidence.
Michael Warren notes that after Donald Russia disparaged the
congressman on Twitter
Trump's comments hung in the air for days, sparking yet
another conversation about the President's race-focused rhetoric. Republicans
largely stayed silent, including Meadows, whose warm relationship with Cummings
prompted questions about his reticence to defend his friend.
When Meadows finally did issue a reply, it came two days
later and second-hand, delivered live on air by CNN contributor and former
Pennsylvania senator Rick Santorum. The statement was a perfect distillation of
the way Republicans have tip-toed around Trump's inflammatory language about
race -- and avoided criticizing the President directly.
"No one works harder for his district than Elijah. He's
passionate about the people he represents, and no, Elijah is not a
racist," Santorum read aloud. The statement also absolved the President of
being a racist and included a promise by Meadows to "go to Baltimore with
President Trump to see what they could do to remediate some of the problems they
have there."
Similarly, Robert Costa reveals that when Mitt Romney was
asked "whether he condemns the president statement on Cummings or supports
it, he would not answer. Asked the question twice. When asked more generally
about the Cummings-Trump matter, he called it 'political theater.'”
It may be too much to expect Meadows, Romney, and other
Republicans to criticize Trump. When the President was accused by Michael Cohen
in February during a House Ways and Means Committee of being "a
racist," Representative Meadows pointed to a black woman, Housing and
Urban Development official Lynne Patton, as proof that Trump was no such thing. Representatives Ayanna Presley and Rashida Tlaib objected to
this approach to racism, and Tlaib referred to use of Patton as a
"prop."
At the time, I posted two videos of Representative Meadows,
once stating "2012 is the time
we're going to send Mr. Obama home to Kenya or wherever it is" and at
another time "we'll send him back to Kenya, or wherever it is." (He
likes "wherever it is..)" He did not say this in a drunken stupor to a friend in a bar. It was in public.
Though Meadows is a birther, committee chairperson Cummings responded to the criticism by Pressley and Tlaib by riding to his friend's rescue, stating
Mr. Meadows, you know, and of all the people on this
committee, I've said it and gotten in trouble for it- that you're one of my
best friends. I know that shocks a lot of people... And I can see and feel your
pain. I feel it.
Five months later, we have Meadows vouching for Cummings by
suggesting that he is no more a racist than is Donald Trump, a remark which has received disturbingly little criticism from members of the other party, let alone Republicans.
There are two morals of the story, neither of which many Democrats will pick up on.
Not only did Cummings attest to his friendship with Meadows
in February, the latter defended his exploitation of- uh, er reference to-
Patton by asserting "There’s
nothing more personal to me than my relationship — my nieces and nephews are
people of color...."
I then maintained
racially-biased whites can have black friends. A 2009 Pew
survey found that 86% of whites, as noted here,
"who think that most blacks aren’t intelligent, law-abiding,
honest, hard-working and/or generous have African American friends."
Democrats (and centrists, the media, and others) have to
stop assessing tolerance by the quota method. Decades ago, it was "some of
my best friends are colored." It now has been replaced by "my nieces
and nephews are people of color" or "half the people in my
administration/in my campaign/on my staff are "people of color." (The
symmetry between "people of color" and "colored." may be
less ironic than it seems.) It's also "look at my African-American friend
over there."
Additionally, Democrats need to understand that when Republican
politicians tell them privately that they don't like President Trump, are
uncomfortable with his latest tweet, or have doubts about the President's
latest appointment, they are lying or simply won't turn personal misgivings
into action. It makes little difference; the Democrats are being played.
They won't be there when it matters, as Mark "neither
man is a racist" Meadows has demonstrated.
Share |
No comments:
Post a Comment