In his defense, it's difficult keeping track of things when
you're on both the Judiciary and Intelligence committees of the House of
Representatives in an age in which the President is trampling on the law, the
constitution, and the country. If you're also running for President, it's even
easier to forget and it gives you an incentive not to remember. Moreover, his priorities may be all to prevalent among other Democrats
If Swalwell's plan is more than talk, it would require less-than-friendly, and probably violent, visits to many homes by law enforcement personnel. However, the congressman's apparent emphasis on gun safety legislation is admirable.
Share |
In Thursday night's debate in Miami, Representative Eric Swalwell
maintained that he is running for President because he is part of the younger
generation, the one which will "end climate chaos," "solve the
student loan debt" (sic), and "end gun violence.
Earlier, he had stated that if there would be only one thing
he'd get passed early in his presidency, it would be "ending gun
violence." When the issue of gun safety was raised, Swallwell was asked
how his plan for a national, mandatory firearm buyback would work in
pro-gun states and he responded
Keep your pistols, keep your rifles, keep your shotguns but
we can take the most dangerous weapons from the most dangerous people. We have
the NRA on the ropes because of the Moms because the Brady Group, because of
Giffords, because of March for Our Lives. But I’m the only candidate on this
stage calling for a ban and buyback of every single assault weapon in America.
I’ve seen the plans of the other candidates here. They would all leave 15
million assault in our communities. They wouldn’t do a single thing to save a
single life in Parkland. I will approach this issue as a prosecutor. I will
approach it as the only person on this stage who has voted and passed
background checks–but also as a parent of a generation who sends our children
to school where we look at what they’re wearing so we can remember it in case
we have to identify them later. A generation who has seen thousands of black
children killed in our streets and a generation who goes to the theater and we
actually where the fire exits are. We don’t have to live this way. We must be a
country who loves our children more than we love our guns.
If Swalwell's plan is more than talk, it would require less-than-friendly, and probably violent, visits to many homes by law enforcement personnel. However, the congressman's apparent emphasis on gun safety legislation is admirable.
Apparent- but not real.
In February the House of Representatives passed the Bipartisan
Background Checks Act of 2019, which would have would have "required background checks in private sales, including gun shows and online transactions. by a vote of 220 to 209.The bill would ensure that all sales (with a few
exceptions) are run through the national criminal background check
system. Having passed the House
with 232 votes from Democrats but only 8 from Republicans, it was dead on
arrival in the Senate.
The bill included an amendment (since reintroduced in the House by a Virginia Republican but stalled in committee) to require that law
enforcement be notified "when an individual attempting to purchase a
firearm fails a federal background check," which notably would have
included illegal immigrants. After first being rejected, the amendment passed
the House with 194 Republican votes (one against) but with only 26 Democratic Representatives in favor and 208 opposed.
On Wednesday night, the only other US Representative queried
on gun safety was Ohio's Tim Ryan, who contended "I support all the gun
reforms here."
Swalwell spoke passionately
about the need to end gun violence. If, however, he had
been as passionate in February, he would have voted in favor of the amendment
which would have helped block individuals in the country illegally from getting
a gun or a rifle. He was, however, among the 208 who voted against it (along with Ryan, Gabbard, and Castro; Delaney not voting).
It seems fairly simple. Some people have no right to a
firearm, and that includes people who have violated the nation's immigration
laws.
Yet, some Democrats don't agree. Swalwell is probably not alone, though we can only speculate how
United States senators would have voted had the bill been acted on in that
chamber. Nor do we know how committed Swalwell, Ryan, or any of the other
23 Democrats would be committed to gun safety legislation if elected
President. However, if I were offered a
bet by someone who believed that the next Democratic president would support
gun legislation which might inconvenience an illegal immigrant, I'd jump on it.
Share |
No comments:
Post a Comment