On Wednesday, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell
responded at a news conference to a question about reparations by stating
There is a lot, a very lot- as the cliche goes- to unpack here.
Share |
Yea, I don't think reparations for something that happened
150 years ago for which none of us is currently living are responsible is a
good idea. We've tried to deal with our original sin of slavery by fighting a
civil war, by passing landmark civil rights legislation. Uh, we've elected an
African-American president. I think we're always a work in progress in this
country but no one currently alive was responsible for that.
There is a lot, a very lot- as the cliche goes- to unpack here.
But the most intriguing point to me is the suggestion that
electing an African-American president was one way in which we've tried to
"deal with our original sin of slavery."
(Two notes here: That latter point was made in a separate
sentence, separated by an "uh" and thus McConnell did not explicitly
attribute that election to the original sin of slavery. Additionally, he did
not say that we have "dealt" with the sin, only that we've
"tried" to deal with it. However, no one else has noticed this, so
we'll assume mine is a distinction without a difference.)
At 1:17 here, The Atlantic staff writer Vann
Newkirk remarks
The thing that really gets me is the comment about President
Obama, the fact that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell seems to believe
that Obama was reparations. That's a tough one for me. I think it was a big
thing for African-Americans, uh, 40 acres and a Barack Obama (last phrase
barely distinguishable, perhaps "that's not how it works.")
He's right: McConnell does seem to believe that the election
of Obama was reparation; it was a big thing for African-Americans; 40 acres and
a Barack Obama is not reparation.
But the statement by the second most powerful Republican in
the land reflected what a lot of Republicans (and many Independents) believe.
Now that Barack Obama was elected, the thinking goes, African-Americans have
been paid back. And as a plus, we have proven that America is not racist.
Oh, you protest, most of those people did not actually vote
for Obama, but I am not a social psychologist, though sometimes I play one
here. But many individuals unsympathetic to demands of minorities for equality
believe- nay, feel- that it is done and accomplished.
Of course, the election of Barack Obama to the presidency
did no such thing The "original sin" was not wiped out because white America had allowed (as is the perception) a black President. However, it was nearly inevitable that many whites would believe it was.
It is thoroughly understandable especially given Newkirk's
comment "I think it was a big thing for African-Americans." If blacks
believe the election of a black President was of tremendous significance, it
should not be surprising that whites- who live in the same country- would labor under the misconception.
The attribution of awesome, historic importance to that
election is misplaced. It's misplaced by
blacks, by whites who voted against Obama, even by some whites who voted for
Barack Obama.
Events of recent years make that clear. Moreover, Joe Biden, currently way out ahead of
his rivals in South Carolina (in which approximately half of Democratic primary
voters are African-American), says "thank you very much." Although a
little harsh about Biden's record and rhetoric about race, Emma Vigeland nevertheless
beginning at 1:33 of the video below recognizes the danger posed by the
Biden-Obama connection as she remarks
The Democratic front-runner now, someone who's polling well
with black Americans, especially older black Americans, is someone who was
supportive of segregation at the outset of his career as a legislator. And so
we have to have a reckoning, we have to have a conversation about why that is
and why maybe name recognition and association with Barack Obama is winning out
over his very disastrous rhetoric at the current moment.
If Biden had not been Vice-President to Barack Obama (for
whom he professes undying love and loyalty), he would have been rudely escorted
from the race by now. That would have occurred even before he bragged about
having palled around with white segregationists in the good 'ol days. And his relationship with those rascals was not as congenial as that he has had with the creditcard industry and other powerful financial interests.
The election of Barack Obama did not significantly alter the
power structure in government or even in society. But it has had a powerful
impact on the attitude of both black and white Americans, a dirty little secret which few very few in the political set are willing to acknowledge.
Share |
No comments:
Post a Comment