Vox's Eric Kleefeld reports that pollsters for GOP firm
Echelon Insights
asked 1,005 Democrats — and independents who favor
Democrats’ policies — about their preferred 2020 candidates. The poll found 38
percent of respondents would vote for Biden if the primary were to be held
right now. This is well in line with other polls; as Vox’s Dylan Scott
reported, most polls show around 40 percent of voters saying they are backing
the former vice president.
The Echelon poll found support for Bernie Sanders to be at
16 percent, and that four candidates: Pete Buttigieg, Elizabeth Warren, Beto
O’Rourke, and Kamala Harris were each supported by 5 percent of respondents. No
other candidate was at more than 2 percent, with 16 percent undecided.
This poll went a step further, by testing Biden in
head-to-head matchups against four other Democratic candidates — and showed him
coming out ahead in each trial, although in each of the hypothetical contests,
the majority of respondents weren’t “definitely” for either candidate.
Kleefeld believes "With numbers like these, it appears
that Biden would remain the candidate to beat even if the race gets narrowed
down to just one or two opponents."
For all those who hope to be aged 65 and older someday, we
need to hope that Kleefeld's observation is off-target. Last month, Branko
Marcetic of In These Times noted that Senator Biden in the 1980s "called then for a spending freeze
on Social Security and a higher Social Security retirement age" And when
President Obama
in 2011 put forward what he called the “big deal”—$4
trillion in deficit reduction, namely through “bend[ing] the cost curve” of
Medicare, Medicaid, and possibly even Social Security—Biden insisted to
Republicans this approach was the best way forward on cutting spending.
According to Woodward’s account, Biden later appeared to offer Boehner a deal
of one dollar cut from Medicare and Medicaid for every dollar of revenue.
Months into the negotiations with recalcitrant Republicans,
Biden admitted that he and the administration had given away everything in
their attempt to strike the “grand bargain.”
“We've given up on revenues, we've given on dollar for
dollar,” Woodward quotes Biden telling McConnell. “All the major things we're
interested in we've given up. So basically you've pushed us to the limit.”
Ironically, the fact that the “grand bargain” never
happened—and that the Obama administration failed to team up with Republicans
to cut Social Security and Medicare—was a result of a stubborn GOP's refusal to
give ground on just about any issue.
Earlier that year, debt negotiations with then-House
Majority Leader Eric Cantor, Senator John Kyl, and other Republicans were
"ultimately scuttled" by Cantor. Prior to that, however, the Vice President had led the talks and his
“opening bid” was cutting $4 trillion in spending over ten
years, with a 3 to 1 proportion of cuts to revenue. Biden later proposed $2
trillion in cuts to general spending, federal retirement funds, Medicare and
Medicaid, and, at Cantor's urging, food stamps.
At one point, Biden suddenly called for $200 billion more in
cuts that had never been discussed, which, according to Woodward, led
then-Maryland Rep. Chris Van Hollen—also involved in the negotiations—to
believe Biden had gone over to the Cantor-Kyl side. Biden again crossed Van
Hollen when he offered to take revenue-raising out of the “trigger”—a
combination of revenue raising and spending cuts meant to be equally
unpalatable to both parties, which would automatically kick in if a deal failed
to be reached.
Later in the negotiations, Biden dangled the possibility of
Medicare cuts in return for more revenue—meaning higher taxes. Soon after, he
suggested Democrats might be comfortable raising the eligibility age for
entitlements, imposing means testing and changing the consumer price index
calculation, known as CPI.
So "Middle Class Joe" has not been a reliablesupporter of earned benefits, as recently as December supporting means-testing for Medicare and Social Security. Additionally, working both sides of the street
may be one of Biden's bag of tricks, for we are reminded that in October 2018
Obama's veep
took the stage at Lake Michigan College as Representative
Fred Upton, a long-serving Republican from the area, faced the toughest race of
his career.
But Mr. Biden was not there to denounce Mr. Upton. Instead,
he was collecting $200,000 from the Economic Club of Southwestern Michigan to
address a Republican-leaning audience, according to a speaking contract
obtained by The New York Times and interviews with organizers. The group, a
business-minded civic organization, is supported in part by an Upton family
foundation.
Mr. Biden stunned Democrats and elated Republicans by
praising Mr. Upton while the lawmaker looked on from the audience. Alluding to
Mr. Upton’s support for a landmark medical-research law, Mr. Biden called him a
champion in the fight against cancer — and “one of the finest guys I’ve ever
worked with.”
Mr. Biden’s remarks, coming amid a wide-ranging discourse on
American politics, quickly appeared in Republican advertising. The local
Democratic Party pleaded with Mr. Biden to repair what it saw as a damaging
error, to no avail. On Nov. 6, Mr. Upton defeated his Democratic challenger by
four and a half percentage points.
Ironically, four months later a veteran House Democrat argued Bernie Sanders "should run as an independent. He's not a Democrat.
So to me, I would not allow a Republican to run as a Democrat or for the
Democratic nomination."
That was a swipe at Bernie Sanders, not at Biden, who is
somehow considered a loyal Democrat and the choice of voters whose top priority
is to nominate a Democrat who would beat Donald Trump. Nor is it Bernie Sanders- or Elizabeth Warren, for that matter- who has advocated cutting Social Security
and Medicare. If Joe Biden is nominated,
there is something weird happening in the Democratic Party, where
"weird" is not spelled "good."
Share
|
No comments:
Post a Comment