Following Robert Mueller's statement Wednesday, a few additional Democratic candidates for President have come to the wise policy and political
decision.
Share
|
Senator Cory Booker tweeted "This Administration has
continued to stonewall Congress’s oversight. Beginning impeachment proceedings
is the only path forward." Former Representative Beto O'Rourke seventeen
minutes later chimed in "There must be consequences, accountability, and
justice. The only way to ensure that is to begin impeachment proceedings."
Senator Kirsten Gillibrand and Representative Seth Moulton also came out definitively to start the process.
They have joined
three other Democratic aspirants, including Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris,
and Julian "don't call me Fidel" Castro, in advocating initiation of impeachment
hearings.
If you noticed two notable names absent, you're paying
attention. Senator Sanders tweeted "Given the reality that we have a president who believes he
is above the law, Congress must continue its investigations. If the House
Judiciary Committee deems it necessary, I will support their decision to open
an impeachment inquiry."
No Democrat, and few Independents, are arguing that Congress
drop its investigations. Neither would anyone expect any Democrat, let alone
one of its candidates, to oppose the House Judiciary Committee if it decides to
open an impeachment inquiry. More could
have been expected of a candidate thought of as bold and candid when he challenged Hillary Clinton in 2016.
More, though, should not have been expected of Joe
"fever will have broken" Biden, and he responded in character, with
his National Press Secretary remarking
.@JoeBiden for President statement on Bob Mueller's comments earlier today: pic.twitter.com/dxiNl2ZmH0— TJ Ducklo (@TDucklo) May 29, 2019
"Elect me and everything will be fine." Biden
recognizes the impeachment process as viable if the Administration continues on
its path, whatever he considers the path to be, and however long it would have
to continue on the "path." Moreover, he does not believe it would be
unavoidable, only that it may be unavoidable.
More telling, however, is Biden's fear that no one would
"relish" an impeachment process- and that it would "divide"
a country which everyone but Joe Biden realizes already is divided. This is the Judiciary Committee
chairperson who backed off in his responsibility to conduct a fair and impartial
hearing on the Clarence Thomas nomination, instead smoothing the way for the
guy who intimidated Biden by claiming "a high tech lynching of an uppity
Negro."
Good ol' Joe feared being divisive. Margaret Carlson nailed
it when last year she wrote
The hearings revealed a weakness in Biden that leads him
astray periodically: a cloying need to be liked, more by his enemies than his
own tribe. His pals Sens. Alan Simpson and Arlen Specter wanted to be done with
the spectacle, by which they meant Hill and the other women with their
inconvenient accusations. Biden told New York magazine that he’d given his word
to then Sen. John Danforth in the gym that he’d use his gavel to make it a very
quick hearing.
In one of the upcoming Democratic presidential debates, the
candidates probably will be asked whether they would agree as President not to
issue a pardon to Donald Trump. Suspense
should rise as we await Joe Biden answering as most- or all- of them do, or
whether he chooses to answer honestly.
No comments:
Post a Comment