Give it up for Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Castigated by
conservatives for appearing "sullen" during most of the State of the
Union address, Ocasio-Cortez responded "We’re flying without a pilot. And
I‘m not here to comfort anyone about that fact."
If (a huge "if") the Supplemental Background Investigation did change the course of history, it only added slightly to Brett Kavanaugh's margin of victory.
Share |
Finally we have an elected official who will speak truth to
power, never shade the truth and always keep her eye on the prize.
I'm joking. Prior to the vote in the Senate Judiciary
Committee to pass the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Senate floor, Ana
Maria Archila famously confronted Republican senator Jeff Flake as he stood in
an elevator. Afterward, Flake cast his "aye" vote on the condition
that there would be an updated FBI investigation of Kavanaugh before the
nomination would be decided in the full chamber.
There was in fact an investigation before the US District
Court of Appeals Judge was approved 50 to 48. And so following to the State of
the Union address on Tuesday, Representative Ocasio-Cortez appeared on MSNBC
with her guest, Ms. Archila, and stated that Archila's act demonstrated
any normal person in any one moment can have the courage
inside them to step up in a critical moment that can change the course of our
country and I think that's what Ana Maria did in that moment in the elevator
and it did change the proceedings of the vote. Senator Flake as a result of her
testimony and the way she expressed her story asked for a further investigation
before this vote proceeded.
It was only 34 days since becoming a member of the United
States Congress, and already Ocasio-Cortez was declaring victory where there
was none. She proclaimed "a critical moment that can change the
course of history" because Flake "asked for a further investigation
before this vote proceeded."
If (a huge "if") the Supplemental Background Investigation did change the course of history, it only added slightly to Brett Kavanaugh's margin of victory.
The FBI investigation was under the control of the White
House, with a strict time limit and the individuals to be interviewed subject
to approval by Senate Republicans.
Neither Kavanaugh nor his accuser, Christine Blasey-Ford, was
interviewed despite the plea of Blasey-Ford's attorneys.
Instead of the report itself being released, the Senate
Judiciary Committee, headed by Republican Chuck Grassley of Iowa, issued an executive summary, which appeared to clear Kavanaugh. However, though the report concluded "there is no corroboration
of the allegations made by Dr. Ford or Ms. Ramirez," USA Today reported at the time
an aide to a Democratic senator on the Judiciary Committee
said Friday that the executive summary released by Republicans is "flat
out wrong."
"We are prevented by Senate rules from saying how and
why, and we choose to respect Senate rules," the aide said.
Assuming the aide was neither lying nor misinformed, the FBI
report did not exonerate Brett Kavanaugh.
"Something is rotten in Denmark" goes the old
saying. At the time, it appeared to most Democrats that the supplemental
investigation was inadequate. In light of the remark of the anonymous aide, it
appears that the investigation itself may have been nearly thorough but that the
committee's majority misled the American public.
Democrats lost.
Enhancing his phony image as a thoughtful moderate, Jeff Flake won, as
did senators Grassley and McConnell and President Trump. Nonetheless, the courageous but ultimately ineffectual Ana
Archila did not "change the course of history," however much Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez wants
us to believe otherwise.
Share |
No comments:
Post a Comment