Beto O'Rourke has apologized.
Did the Democratic candidate to unseat Senator Ted Cruz
sexually assault a woman? Has he used the "n-word?"Did he call his
opponent a "Nazi" or rashly, inaccurately, and offensively referred
to abortion as a "holocaust?" (No, that would be a few
right-wingers.)
R-E-L-A-X. It's far less serious than the latter two, and
not in the same universe as the first. Instead, Politico reports
In 1991, the 19-year-old O’Rourke reviewed the Broadway
musical “The Will Rogers Follies” for the Columbia Daily Spectator, the
university’s student newspaper. Writing under the byline Robert O’Rourke, he
panned the performance as “one of the most glaring examples of the sickening
excesses and moral degradations of our culture.”
He went on to bemoan the bevy of “perma-smile actresses
whose only qualifications seem to be their phenomenally large breasts and tight
buttocks.”
The review in the Oct. 10, 1991, edition of the Spectator,
which according to an archive search was the only article he wrote for the
newspaper, offers another glimpse of the former life of the Texas Senate
candidate, who has given Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) an unexpectedly serious
reelection challenge. It also shows how drastically the sensitivities surrounding
descriptions of women have changed over the past three decades: While it’s
unclear whether O’Rourke was criticizing the musical’s use of scantily-clad
women for effect or commenting on their bodies himself, his prose, in
hindsight, is jarring either way.
No, it's not jarring and no, it's not unclear.
O'Rourke is being criticized for being sexist or
misogynistic or insensitive for pointing out that a for-profit cultural event
(which became highly successful) was itself misogynistic and/or insensitive.
But the candidate belongs to the Democratic Party. And so
while a nominee for the United States Supreme Court very likely perjures
himself about attempting to rape a female and about nearly everything else,
O'Rourke sends to Politico a statement reading in part "I am ashamed of
what I wrote and I apologize. There is no excuse for making disrespectful and
demeaning comments about women."
There is not, and there might be cause for apology if he had
in fact made a disrespectful or demeaning comment about women.
O'Rourke deserves credit for not issuing a fau-apology along the lines of "I apologize if anything I said may have been hurtful to someone." But the apology culture has taken hold with Democrats- apologize first, think second, attack never. Politico added "The column was flagged to
POLITICO by a person who opposes O’Rourke’s Senate campaign."
Hardly newsworthy, this is a case of a media outlet being
used by a political campaign. O'Rourke
would have been better off noting that this was a smear performed by a
political operative doing Ted Cruz's dirty work for him. And if that would have entailed a swipe at
the mainstream media, all the better. It may be what much of the public has
been waiting for a Democrat to do for some time.
No comments:
Post a Comment