The author of the now-famous New York Times editorial
blasting President Trump is a dangerous enabler and right-wing libertarian. It's the dime store libertarian (but I repeat myself):
excited about "free minds (and) effective deregulation, historic tax
reform," yet giddy about "a more robust military."
He is not talking about offering someone up to the Department of Justice or the local county prosecutor. He's referring to himself as judge, jury, and executioner, less president than, say, a governor in ancient Rome.
At least he took a swipe at Trump's "mass-marketing of
the notion that the press is the 'enemy of the people.'"
It would have been a glaring omission. Early Wednesday morning, President Trump tweeted
Isn’t it a shame that someone can write an article or book,
totally make up stories and form a picture of a person that is literally the
exact opposite of the fact, and get away with it without retribution or cost.
Don’t know why Washington politicians don’t change libel laws?
Washington Post syndicated columnist Ruth Marcus responded
"Don’t know why Washington politicians don’t change libel laws? Let me
help you out here. It’s called the First Amendment."
Wednesday evening, Trump regaled us with
Does the so-called “Senior Administration Official” really exist, or is it just the Failing New York Times with another phony source? If the GUTLESS anonymous person does indeed exist, the Times must, for National Security purposes, turn him/her over to government at once!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 5, 2018
To paraphrase Ruth Marcus: "Don't know why a media
outlet won't turn someone over for prosecution for expressing an opinion about
operation of the federal government? It's called the First Amendment." Six
days earlier in Evansville, Indiana, Trump had told exuberant rally goers
All I can say is our Justice Department and our FBI, at the
top of each because inside they have incredible people, our Justice Department
and our FBI have to start doing their job and doing it right. What's happening
is a disgrace and at some point — I wanted to stay out — but at some point if
it doesn’t straighten out properly ... I will get involved.
He is not talking about offering someone up to the Department of Justice or the local county prosecutor. He's referring to himself as judge, jury, and executioner, less president than, say, a governor in ancient Rome.
A week earlier, evangelical Paula White had presented President
and Mrs. Trump with a Bible "signed by over a hundred Christian evangelicals" and noted that the inscription read
First Lady and President, you are in our prayers always. Thank you for your courageous and bold stand for religious liberty, and for your timeless service to all Americans. We appreciate the price that you have paid to walk in the high high calling. History will reward the greatness that you have brought for generations. We pray this prayer. And if all of you agree with that, say "Amen."
signed by over a hundred Christian evangelicals (who)
Those evangelicals might want to read that book themselves,
and can start with Matthew 4:8-9 (hat tip to Suzanne Witzen):
Again, the devil took
him to a very high mountain and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and
their glory. And he said to him, “All these I will give you, if you will fall
down and worship me.”
Share
|
No comments:
Post a Comment