Ian Bremmer and Malcolm Nance, the latter in response to the former, consider President Trump's affinity toward Russian President Vladimir Putin:
No serious foreign policy analyst I know (nor any ex-Trump Admin official) has a good explanation for why Trump is so singularly enamored with Russian President Vladimir Putin.— ian bremmer (@ianbremmer) June 8, 2018
Whatever the reason is, we don’t know it yet.
Only counterintelligence explains Trumps slavishness. He a witting asset of the Kremlin. Since the Nobu Resturant meeting with the Russian Oligarchs in November 2013 he has been convinced Russian is his greatest supporter. He won’t let them down. #HailHydra https://t.co/Hqbxi9kkIs— Malcolm Nance (@MalcolmNance) June 8, 2018
Early Thursday morning, The New Yorker posted by Susan
Glasser an article in which she referred to a security conference in the
Estonian capital the previous week and added
When I went to Berlin after the Tallinn conference, I
talked with several German officials who made similar references to personal
and familial dysfunction. In their view, Trump’s decision to take on his allies
on so many issues all at once is quite different from the standard-issue
European policy disputes with the United States, such as the 2003 rift over
George W. Bush’s invasion of Iraq, or Ronald Reagan’s early nineteen-eighties
military buildup against the Soviet Union. Those were differing views over how
to protect the alliance; now Trump is questioning the alliance itself. “It’s
like your parents questioning their love for you,” Norbert Röttgen, the
chairman of the Bundestag’s foreign-affairs committee, told me on Monday. “It’s
already penetrated the subconscious.”
That was Thursday morning. It wasn't until Friday morning
that the President left the White House to be flown to the two-day G-7 summit
in Canada and stated "Russia should be in this meeting. Whether you like it or
not, and it may not be politically correct, but we have a world to run. . . .
They should let Russia come back in."
And so the President of the USA wants Vladimir Putin's
Russia to be join the group of seven allies. It would, at least, alleviate the
need to tell our intelligence secrets to the Kremlin. But wait- run that one by me
again, will you?
We have a world to run. Trump wasn't talking about the G7-8, the Transatlantic alliance, or the European Union. One year ago, a former undersecretary of State and ambassador to NATO wrote
America and Europe are experiencing their most
significant crisis in decades. President Trump’s recent visit to NATO and
the EU was the least successful of any U.S. president in seven decades,
exposing deep ideological divisions and a widening gulf of trust across the Atlantic.
Last weekend’s terrorist attacks in London had the same effect. Trump
repeatedly criticized London
Mayor Sadiq Khan for
telling citizens not to be alarmed by the attacks, when Khan actually
said they should not be alarmed by a heavy police presence. Trump’s tweets did
not go down well in stoic Britain, where the World War II maxim, “keep calm and
carry on,” still holds.....
The heart of the problem is Trump’s view of Europe, and
Germany in particular, as an economic competitor rather than a strategic
partner. This is a sea change in American attitudes towards
Europe. All of Trump’s predecessors dating to President Truman
have prized Europe’s political and military alliance with America. Trump’s
boorish behavior in Brussels and his intemperate tweets criticizing Merkel (and now Khan) have only reinforced the doubts about him in
Europe
In late May, after criticism of NATO from President Trump, Angela
Merkel remarked "I have experienced this in the last few days. And that is
why I can only say that we Europeans must really take our fate into our own
hands."
That was in May, 2017. Now, as David Corn mused on AM Joy on
Saturday morning, Trump "doesn't want a G-7. He wants a G-2, maybe a G-3"
(mainland China included).
Actual "fate" is pre-determined. Otherwise, fate wouldn't be fate. But if the European Union doesn't want Europe- and possibly the globe- split up by two or three world powers, it needs to start, yesterday.
Actual "fate" is pre-determined. Otherwise, fate wouldn't be fate. But if the European Union doesn't want Europe- and possibly the globe- split up by two or three world powers, it needs to start, yesterday.
Share
|
No comments:
Post a Comment